Only about 15% reaches the beneficiary in government schemes. Are government run relief programs likely to have a better percentage? If not, then what do efficiency minded liberals do in disasters like tsunami?

Roger Bate has an answer: Donor nations could leverage earmarked aid funds by a multiple of three or four, depending on their tax rates, by allowing tax deductions to their own corporate and individual taxpayers for investments and philanthropy in designated developing countries. In other words, government-to-government aid could be converted into a larger amount of citizen-to-citizen aid.

Isn’t that a grand idea! Read the full article

Previous articleHeritage Foundation’s Economic Freedom Index
Next articleRe-thinking Tsunami Aid
Parth Shah
Parth J. Shah is Founder President of Centre for Civil Society, a think tank that promotes choice and accountability across public and private sectors. Parth’s research and advocacy work focuses on the themes of economic freedom, choice and competition in education, property rights approach to the environment and new public management. He is a member of the education task-force of the governments of Delhi and Karnataka, and serves on the Senate of the Central University of Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. He recently edited Liberalism in India.